blog prompt for Feb 6

The author uses many people comparing to McCandless. Although Ruess and McCandless both had desire to be in the wild, their causes were different. From the memories of McCandless parents and sister, Chris had shown different characters since he was really young. He admired his grandfather and he was really interested in being in the wild. He flouted his teacher's rules about writing articles. These phenomena showed that he was a different guy. If there had no issues between him and his family, I believe that he still would have been going to the wild. These issues happened between him and his family was only a excause for Chris to run away from his home. Probably he did exggerate these issues, but I guess he would still do that.

about " Into the Wild"

The author of "Into the Wild" Krakauer uses others' comments of Chris McCandless to express his own feeling. Most of the comments are positive and few of them are negative, which means that the author has positive attitude about Chris McCandless, otherwise he wouldn't use these positive comments. For me, I still think that McCandless's death is not very significant. If I write a book about this guy, probably I would choose both sides of him. For example, McCandless has a bad relationship with his family, and he is a nice guy who impressed Charlie very much. Although it's a little bit paradox, it shows McCandless's paradox. In strangers' eyex, he was a nice and popular guy, but he didn't get well with his family. In addition, he decided to go to the wild, he read so many books, but he only took few stuffs with him, which is also a paradox. If I write a book about McCandless, I will name my book as "Innocent or significant", which describes his death.

Whatever

Actually I don't really care who is the president. I know it sounds weired but it is true. The goal of every president is to benefit his people. Maybe he is not a perfect guy, but it doesn't matter because people will only pay attention on what he does for the people.
I have been student for more than 10 years, but I still have no idea about the methods of voting a president. In the year that I became 18 years old, my teacher gave me a ballot paper to vote a deputy to the NPC. In some way I was scared because I had never imagined it before. If I had known, I would have done some research about these candidates. However, I hadn't. So I had to choose a candidate whose name sounded better.
I know that the voting system in USA is different and the candidates go to many places to have lectures to persuade people to vote them. I think it is interesting because probably people won't have enought time to listen to them.
Next time I think I will do more research about voting and selection.